True - but do not stop, you can already prepare for Q2
Be sure to submit this report in the application, I think the jury members will take into account your activity.
I do not see hackernoon on the list.
I am the only one who managed to make Hackernoon analytical report before the voting process.
added
Pregnancy Tracker Report
1 Like
Analytic work based on previous six partner offers will be qualified for Q2 report submission or only partners offer proposed in Q2 will be qualified for the Q2 analytic report submission
Any partnerships that are relevant, which they have not voted yet
and if there were no analytical reports for previous DeAnalytics
Analytical reports on partnerships in 2020. For which there has not yet been a vote and analytical reports, they are eligible to be accepted for the DeAnalytics Q1 competition.
The members of the jury will necessarily accept the reports of the partners received in January / February / March, the remaining reports will be a good advantage in the participant’s application.
Yes, I think that Pregnancy Tracker and Hackernoon are also worth considering.
As a result, there are currently 8 offers.
Analytical reports on partner offers that will be received in the second quarter (April / May / June) will participate in the DeAnalytics Q2 competition. Also, participants should add KPI reports on existing partnerships (before receiving the next tranche).
Determining the final reward
I think that this way, it will be more honest.
The maximum number of partner reports for calculating the competitive remuneration will depend on the participant who provided the largest number of analytical reports.
For example: During the quarter, 10 partner offers were received.
Sub 1 made 2 reports
Sub 2 made 4 reports
Sub 3 made 8 reports
Sub 4 made 5 reports
Sub 6 made 1 report
Despite the fact that the reports are completed for all (10) partners.
Contest Reward will depend on the participant (Sub 3) who completed 8 reports.
1 Like
I think changing the rules on the last day of receiving reports is not a good idea.
In addition, I read many complaints in telegram about the fact that there are many reports on the same companies, so I was specifically looking for a project on which no one made reports.
The proposed system removes the motivation to make reports on different companies, the participants will duplicate the same projects.
Change the rules, not in any case.
I need more comments on this idea. I think it’s fairer. I will try to apply it in DeAnalytics Q2.
In the current terms of the competition, it is prescribed.
If we stick to this, then during the period of the first quarter, I counted only 4 received partner offers.
Although nine partners were processed.
Five of Q1
Four from last year. I think the current contest should close last year’s gap.
We need more comments from the community and participants.
1 Like
Partnerships received in the first quarter /2021
DeFi Alliance / ForgingBlock / Koshelek / ReflexToken / Hackernoon / Clicksoft
Last year’s partnerships, (no analytical report, no vote)
Aparat Video Sharing Platform
Pregnancy Tracker
TON BRAINS
YPO Impact
DIGITAL PROOF
SIGMA Can be attributed to Q1, the AMA session was held in February 2021
RusBit Can be attributed to Q1, the partnership was filed before the New Year holidays.
Let me know if I missed something.
2 Likes
Hello, our teamwork:
- TON BRAINS
- SiGMA
- hackernoon
- koshelek ru
- Clicksoft
- forgingblock
- reflex token
- digital proof
- rusbit
- YPO
2 Likes
Try to help
A single list will be a clear confirmation of what kind of analytics and in what quantity Analytics & Support Sub-governance provides.
DeFi Alliance
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1om83hp41TanBgQNgj3v2TIXZoDRtV_z3/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QX4FI34O-pexaxrb6RkdSlRH5z-p2bqV/view
ForgingBlock
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mRItFYYBFkg1_fhcTU70qunYh0Pd6Fr8/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10v16OlJqkGXIENdWJng0eCfZFeaLbBi8/view
Koshelek
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EPOacuv8yILQKOc5uMZloQUBEn1kpuPz/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1G5lp49-XAmt-WB_t0ejWwBfBoGDUUS8G/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pIEkZ8WmxgyCZ462b-k7KUjrjD4huoBn/view
ReflexToken
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hKSFygdEdb9hWQtpP3OIQ0zF6UMkVuBj/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eLE2kgdrIadDNeTekpPNCOgdSImI8ekT/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FtaAScXj2ogoXjTWYz32fdAqHHU34jb_/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiaP3Q9tAuI45_VevuTkzkXXFIWVi_zA/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FL6qBGD_dB66hvwNhOLQWwnSDNolbGVh/view
Hackernoon
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10Atc218mGmYd5Q5nuu-9B8gSuqa7oZqQ/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eAv71UaXQUv8twEW_aUOG592Icn1uySH/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E1ORRq7XnlFvCMuV-7-G_BHoGZ5k66lI/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M0L7hv86cHB1rHNPgZNxZQki891CkBre/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hihJdr2m89mDgvTLZnuLixFG2aJobpNx/view
Clicksoft
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IRGl9GyYIOLd2-ejKL6kFwaJrVnLVCHo/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b1iD2Gv0bK_erEaLLBhRu2VKThqEJdBg/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wN9LdGS-qMsTv8UQd09DcOxIEV70663q/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10nbHr2My0htcxM-soFFxmb-_yoj-8T2z/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1razzcE12X51Hxhz5BVMz5G_KSZgBsT9b/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zcZSss0i__MGrV7RZHXpjJg4KuNdQ7X3/view
SIGMA
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BrAnpb9kNhMGWvnH5O_eVzXT-KjrylVe/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OlMWA8uPtGxtoHqDgLGbzj6dHiLyLUXd/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RHIvHj9At3LmREiZBjpYVMyqHs1FlVrW/view
Aparat Video Sharing Platform
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17jdl2mhOyO8gq0AIhPPiWxBgOOx6XIIF/view
Pregnancy Tracker
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pu6w2LiW5UQlDReP9LxfxHJgw3LaTGIN/view
TON BRAINS
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Iyh4fCjJROT9nN3u7ztICfQI5DcCOMva/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U_CeKJltYOz5SX1_VQg3mK_KaIwX4pDv/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qwl4e_P0xwrUJ75ay0U_YlXungMFqsjk/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CKFRm8hr2eAYSDxfMn6P5f497pFi5zTT/view
YPO Impact and EIS21
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10Ed3uHeHFUlsnGi8RE1uSFJYlRKOcXGK/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hx3_heA6VVDlI1MxwEUxCL8ppSHjLFTX/view
Digital Proof
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VCf4WH6ZU26HBz5u1Zw2slE55PSwYnNh/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MSeC5AtqteFqhdCSYAuD8KJJK7N6rqSa/view
RusBit
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uACnChgrrou0Wf0Ae29lvI5Eog9UrHAc/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F1tNaD7R1FmYVxjXQeXYun2g2PVKKltA/view
2 Likes
Если планируется DeAnalytics Q2, то хотелось бы определиться с его условиями в течение первой недели апреля.
DeAnalytics Q1 contest долго обсуждали и запустили только в конце февраля, поэтому вся работа пришлась на март, а это безумная нагрузка даже для команды. Кроме того, какие-то партнерства уже были приняты в январе-феврале, мы не стали по ним делать отчеты, т.к уже не было актуально.
I do not understand why you consider that there were 8 reports if the total number of reports made in the first quarter is 13.
I remember someone in the chat complained that there are more than 80 partners, and there are only 20 reports.
The participants found actual projects without reports, did them, and now they are no longer counted? I don’t think it’s fair.
How will it be counted?
KPI report will be equal to 1 partner analysis? KPI report will be several times less in terms of labor costs
Or will it not be counted at all?
Wouldn’t it be better to make a separate deAnalitics for KPI reports?
You have made three reports, and you will receive a reward as if you have made 13 reports. This is not fair, in the next DeAnalytics Q2, I will do everything to prevent this from happening. I think that focusing on the participant with the maximum number of reports is the best option. In the current contest, I see a participant who has made 10 reports.
I do not consider the “KPI check” to be a full-fledged report, but I am sure that the jury members will respond positively to the participants who will provide such reports. Checking the KPI will make the participant’s application stronger. Anyone can check the KPI.
Самое важное, это будет ли одобрен бюджет 150к на DeAnalytics Q2. Мне нужно привести в порядок Драфт и убедиться что есть бюджет. После этого сразу можно запускать.
The most important thing is whether the 150k budget will be approved for DeAnalytics Q2. I need to get the Draft in order and make sure there’s a budget. After that, you can immediately run it.
Когда будет запущен Q1? Также подготовил отчеты по партнерствам первого квартала, хотел бы принять участие.