I think we should reject two jury members and their votes. Not for personal gain, rather i don’t want them to get paid (as i know, 5 % from reward pool) for their poor work. To rate good works with 1 (on ten point scale) is beyond good and evil. And one of them rated plagiarized work with 9 and the other one rated with 9 work without any sketch.
Мне кажется мы должны проголосовать за исключение двух судей и их судейских решений. Не ради личной выгоды, а скорее потому что я не считаю что люди ставящие авторским работам единицы заслуживают получить долю из пула наград.
Кто не работает, тот не ест. А когда ты оцениваешь плагиат на 9, или работу в которой нет одного из самых важных пунктов на 9, то очевидно что работы ты никакой не делал а ставил от балды.
judges write to me that you have a strong cartoon character, and anime is not a strong cartoon character? What is the difference? You want to give me a small ball, just do not argue in this way, write a bad job and that’s it.
It is totally bad idea to judge judges. Of course that voting is an epic fail. You learn from it and do not take part in the next one. An the next one… Until the system is finally adequate.
If i remember correctly, in some previous contests few jury members were rejected because of their total inadequacy.
And this is normal. If you rating plagiarized content higher than original and you even don’t want to check is it plagiat or not, why you should be paid for your work?
Firstly, the voting must be secret for the public and the judges themselves until the moment of completion. It must be recorded in the blockchain in an encrypted form and decrypted after the end of the voting with a multisig of the jury members, for example. This makes the problem of pressure on judges in the voting process irrelevant. It will also prevent lazy judges, who wait until the last, to put down their marks without even reading the papers, but simply reformulating the previous judges, as is happening now. It will also prevent judges can influence the opinions of each other.
I would like to once again raise the topic of incorrect voting by some members of the jury. In particular
0: f4f2113d72de3c37214e7376ed06f95251b957f273edfa5c3397fc2a36834c05
0: b1af91c036e373c4f54a75877a350287cac7e32340a8d21e712e151ee44983e7
-1: 0463743f7dc6eef2993f9bdb760500ad2f25e41b62a3d7674045a1aa8f25cba0
I looked at each work like a jury, and looked at the marks that they gave
IN ADVANCE, I SAY I DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST OTHER WORK, BUT EVERYTHING IS KNOWN IN COMPARISON AND THIS IS A COMPARISON OF THEIR ESTIMATES
Let’s compare their estimates, for this work in particular -1: 0463743f7dc6eef2993f9bdb760500ad2f25e41b62a3d7674045a1aa8f25cba0
Gives an estimate of 4 points, seriously for this compared to other works?

Next, let’s move on to work under number 9, here the judge gives a score of 6 for one page and actually copied an ordinary example of a 3D body in a blender, with a stuck crystal

Application number 20 just 6 points for a good story
Application number 24 seriously 4 points ???

Application number 35 is serious 9 points ???

No. 32 great application here question to 0: f4f2113d72de3c37214e7376ed06f95251b957f273edfa5c3397fc2a36834c05
Again, I have no goal of belittling the work of other participants, but I do not understand their assessment system and it all does not look very good, while my work was rated at 1 point, other works are not better or equally assessed better.
Мне кажется, что есть смысл перезапустить конкурс с новыми условиями и акцентом на дизайн, так как судьи оценивают не по правилам, которые прописаны выше.
Ну оценка по большому счету идет не героя, а оформления работы , кто-то просто готовые работы уже с инета достал и вставил значок тон и работал над текстом и готово )
0:00000ad ···· 1d2e928f7
Obvious cheating when your work has 7.27 and takes top 5.
You could have given me 5-6 and i fallen off the top5. Why so brazenly?
Народ вы там в порядке все? проголосовало 13 судей и 1 воздержался из 32, вы считаете, что конкурс состоялся? хорошие работы выбивали из 20, без аргументов, поставив им в последний час, поздней ночью, под конец голосования двоек и единиц… Еще кто то утверждает, что судьи не аффилированы с участниками конкурса или не являются ими?! Весь этот конкурс большей фарс и позор, больше в этой помойке я участвовать не буду.
Are you people all right there? 13 judges voted and 1 abstained from 32, do you think the contest was held? good works were beaten out of 20, without arguments, putting them at the last hour, late at night, at the end of the vote of two and one… Anyone else claims that the judges are not affiliated with the contestants or are not?! This whole contest is more farce and shame, I will not participate in this dump anymore.
