However, 89 has 7 points.
I think they should check it manually
Perhaps, there can be similar “misunderstandings”
где смотреть победителей, не понимаю?
1 Like
So, the vote is over and what we have!
Objective judging and terrible result!
the future hero is in the winners! virtual assistant of FreeTON - GIRL IN SHORTS!
it’s just some kind of nightmare !!!
who were the judges in this contest !?
huge huge question!
again, using my submission as an example:
I got the highest score from the majority of the judges and, at the same time, the unfortunate ones: 1, 1, 2, and 3 points. But you can’t even tell who it is!!
and what are the grounds for such underscore ?!
- “nothing original”!
and this person puts “8/9/8” - to a woman in shorts! a black plush hare without a mouth and to an anime girl !? Really!?
and in addition there is also a comment “amazing job” ?!
another justification - “one point” and explanation:
- “nothing original” - ONE score to my hero from a man who for a girl in shorts a T-shirt and an incomprehensible mask (nowadays other masks are relevant!) - puts “9/9/10” - the same “gorgeous” woman in shorts! a creepy hare (with a completely terribly incomprehensible rationale “why not” - and the anime girl!
third comment from the jury who gave “two points”:
- “not enough drawings!”
what are you talking about!?!?! under the terms of the contest it was not even clear that visualization was needed there at all !!! some submissions were made without drawings at all !!!
The second place was taken by a hare, which is generally barely depicted in black, moving with a gray shadow from slide to slide!
Just write the rule in the contest requirements
“we want an anime cartoon with a half-naked woman! well, you can also draw some crystals and substitute the inscription “FreeTON” - that’s what we need! " - and all diversified creatives will disappear at once, and you, satisfied, will receive your awful cartoon and 5 percent of the prize fund, and go alongside with a FreetON to a bright, beautiful future!
If you like anime so much, why did you pass on other characters with such hatred and lower their avr. score so much !!?!?
only if!
only if there is no benefit of its own!
after such contests, there are very big questions about what the FreeTON community really is !!!
if you just want to divide the money of the community members among yourselves - giving it over to the teams of judges - why hold the so-called “open contests” - involving people to spend a lot of time and energy on something in what they have absolutely no chance !? !?
If I’m wrong, show us the legitimacy of the judging and their lack of any interest and involvement in the winning submissions.
The competition could be the beginning of a huge wave of FreeTON popularity! people love cool pictures! you have nullified it! Nice job
11 Likes
My sincere congratulations to the winner. Without a doubt, a lot of time, effort and talent were invested in this work. The victory is deserved.
However, I am of the opinion that this handsome face could represent an online casino or gaming platform, but not a serious blockchain project.
Showy sexuality is out of fashion these days and even may discredit the project.
8 Likes
Thank you for calling me sexy and handsome. I won’t let you down. I really need these tokens for brain surgery.
А мне нравитьсяпобедитель, достойная работа
This whole contest is such a joke. And I’m fucking sad that these people didn’t even really try and it was such a piece of cake to steal this victory even though there was a clear and proven cheating
I hope these people like rats will stay in this community and will abuse it as long as it takes to sink this ship so the idea of decentalization won’t be comromised and ruined completely.
And guys crystal and diamond are fucking different things with different shapes you’re embarrassing yourself at this point, fyi
1 Like
не пойму, чем вам не нравится победитель?
Isn’t a diamond is a crystal itself? 
Diamond is a mineral with a crystalline structure, so no contradiction for me right here
you can see final grades here, but there’s no table of winners afaik
Oh, the topic migrated here, sorry, haven’t been on the forum for a while.
Lots of good works out there. But funny fact - I said that the spokesperson should be a girl, and here it is 
Nice
1 Like
When we’ll see a final spreadsheet?
Yes, when will we see the top 20 works?
1 Like
Good catch by @azaticus
Care to comment anything @Nikolai_V ? Why did you present it as “Original character design was created specially for the FreeTON contest” while it was a bought ready game model?
4 Likes
3 Likes
Take my words back…
3 Likes
Look for adult content will be removed again 
Hey. This is the A&S Subgovernance summary on # 81 Contest: Virtual Hero / Spokesperson of Free TON (bilingual).
As part of the range of tasks of our SubGovernance, we reviewed the results of the # 81 Contest: Virtual Hero / Spokesperson of Free TON and came to the following conclusions:
Analysis of the winning work
At the moment, work # 62 scored the maximum average score: 8.62
About it, the following facts were discovered:
-
The design was purchased from the marketplace.
-
The materials were purchased under the condition of commercial use, but we do not know the specific type of license purchased. In any case, according to the Daz (marketplace) conditions, exclusive rights are not transferred. Therefore, the work is not created specifically for FreeTON or the competition held.
-
The authors of the application misled the jury about the exclusivity of the work.
Conclusions:
- The participant complied with the competition’s formal criteria since there was no prohibition on purchasing stock materials or misleading the jury.
- We consider misleading the jury to be proven, in connection with which there are doubts about the team /author of the winning work professionalism.
Separately, we note that questions on originality and copyright are also arizes for prize applications numbered 17, 26, 32, and 38. We do not guarantee that this is a complete list since we did not have time for a full check.
Analysis of the organization of the competition
In connection with the composition of the works that received prizes, we reviewed the competition for the completeness of its criteria for the admission of works and assessments.
The following conclusions were made:
-
In the proposed conditions of the competition, the issues of copyright infringement, transfer of rights, plagiarism, buying works on stocks, and attracting freelancers were ignored - each of which is important, from our point of view, when conducting creative competitions.
-
These questions were also ignored by Main Governance when launching the competition.
-
These questions were ignored by most voted members of the Jury, or they were not given enough attention.
-
Also, the conditions of the competition did not contain criteria for disqualification or other mechanics that would legitimately filter out works that contradict the spirit of the competition, violate someone’s copyright or other rights, or, in the opinion of the project community, do not meet the development objectives of FreeTON.
-
As a result of the absence of such criteria, a legitimate revision of the competition results is impossible, and almost any decision will damage the motivation of the FreeTON community.
Summarizing the above arguments, Analytics & Support SubGovernance considers the competition held and its results unsatisfactory and not in the project’s interests.
Conclusions and recommendations
-
The decision to disqualify (or not) the winning submission # 62 remains with Main Governance as the competition’s organizers. Any decision has its pro and contra and will have an impact on the community.
-
Similar decisions on works 17, 26, 32, and 38 also remain with the Main Governance.
-
The conditions of the competition indicate the criteria by which further work with the results is carried out:
Analytics & Support SubGovernance notifies Main Governance, the Jury, and the competition participants that we refuse to implement any contest submissions, regardless of their score.
-
Also, with all due respect to the merits of the initial members and not doubting the competence of the Jury, we doubt the ability of Main Governance and Main Governance Jury to organize, accept and judge such competitions - with a large number of works requiring verification and needing clear criteria submission and evaluation.
-
We recommend that Main Governance refrains from approving and considering such contests in the future and implement them only within the framework of the relevant SubGovernance. In the absence of a specialized SubGovernance, not accepting such contests in principle.
-
We recommend the Web & Design Subgovernance (or anyone else who considers himself capable), after consulting with the community, to conduct an additional competition for a virtual hero, correcting the organizational problems that we identified. Also, we recommend Main Governance to allocate additional funds to the relevant SubGovernance for its implementation.
19 Likes