All uploaded works can be used anywhere. I apologize if this assessment has prevented you from getting into the prizes. This is my personal opinion and evaluation of the work. I should have given more feedback on the quality of the work.
I look at your scores and see that there are two other jurors who gave it a 4. So far it is low decentralized voting, unfortunately. So please don’t blame one person and don’t be so hurtful, although I understand you.
It is also my personal opinion that we should not have such simple contests with a huge amount of submissions in the nearest future while there is a small number of jury members, because the evaluation is too subjective, and can lead to such consequences. In addition, it is not immune to the attack of hired freelancers doing low-quality work to collect more prizes.
The work is really super! Worthy of a New Year’s greeting card. Unique design.
Taking into account the fact that the judges are not competent - bad non-unique works were awarded and good works were banned, this sub-governing should be dissolved.
Guys, I will gladly accept any decision of decentralized community. I came here to develop open source design community and use my skills in all possible ways. The current voting system is not doing as well as we believe it should.
And please comment on the fact why the work of the chef Kabanov got into the prizes. It was a New Year’s card contest, and he presented an advertising banner for a meat processing plant.
How do you rate your skills?
How the works got into the prizes, which can be seen with the naked eye, that they were taken from ready-made sources (crystals were simply stuck on them). Some of them look really terrible. Do you think you are competent?
Don’t ask for forgiveness - this is kindergarten. You just had to do your job. Imagine if doctors were as wrong as you! This is unacceptable.
I am ashamed of you!
Yes, I was one of the first to vote, and I didn’t see the other jurors’ scores. I agree that the score looks low and there is a lack of detail about the quality of the work in comment. But I would rate the quality of the work as a 5, but the concept of giving away tokens seems out of place to me. Unfortunately for you, this is my subjective evaluation, which should be equalized by a decentralized voting system.
Obviously because the jury members voted that way. I would be happy to see a more decentralized judging in our sub-governance, to prevent any voting fraud. Also,I tried to be as objective and professional as possible.
All members of the jury tried to check all the works for stock materials, but sometimes it is very difficult to do so. All found stock solutions were marked in the file, it would be great to see help from the participants in catching the rogues using such solutions. But alas we have what we have.
You even make excuses poorly.
Trying to blame the system and dispel responsibility among the community. “Your subjective assessment” is your lack of professionalism.
In addition, there is special software to check the uniqueness of the work (you should know this).
I hope in your life you will not meet the same “professional” among a doctor, pharmacist, auto mechanic, etc.
But the fact that you did your job badly is a fact.
It is also interesting (but I’m too lazy to look) what rating you put on the “festive” banner of the meat-packing plant, if the rating from you is not 1 or 2 - which is quite justified, because the banner of the meat-packing plant is not a festive postcard from the word, at all, then you are not just a terrible specialist, but also a corrupt person.
