If the bounty reward is not paid, then this may affect the reputation of Free TON. This is not a good idea. I think it’s too late to say that the bounty was not needed. I also think the bounty was successful.
Please read this article at the beginning and then tell me how you can register KPI from cointelegraph ?
I mean, bitcointalk.org is better known than cointelegraph, it is the foundation of the cryptocurrency ecosystem and advertising there is most valuable and effective.
This is a very correct observation, especially since the proposal was approved.
It is enough to see how the activity on this forum has increased, this is the first. The second is the Free TON advertisement on the 3 most popular forums in the world. Moreover, even after the end of the signature, many participants continue to wear their signatures. Most importantly, I don’t understand why there are questions now, if the contest was initially approved with all the above points?
I think that if now there are doubts about the results, as stated above, then in the absence of payment, everyone will see the result of the cancellation immediately … I’m not hinting at anything in any way - I just know what the result will be
Failure to understand the power of the crypto community can have adverse consequences. If community with a reputation will present the project in a negative way, which does not keep its word, does not pay for the work, then the attitude towards the project will be negative.
A signature campaign on Bitcoin is now the best option to advertise a project. The community did the job, the project got good advertising. But if our work is not paid, the community will advertise the project, only from the negative side. Then the consequences will be much more serious. Nobody wants to deal with a project that cheats.
Good point. Compare your work with Cointelegraph. They get 7 millions of TONs. Just follow and put everything in question what CT do and why it has more value as your work.
Why are there negative concerns raised when the campaign has already ended? Would I have known about free ton if not for the bounty campaign? Hell No. If the reputation of the growing project is brushed by the three popular crypto forums the end result will be too fatal.
Man. Who are you?
Looks like you are the boss here.
The terms and conditions of the campaign itself for participation and implementation are described in this post Signature Bounty Campaign for Crypto Forums extension Proposal [19.10-15.11.2020], as well as on all forums in separate threads - Bitcointalk, Altcoinstalks, Cryptotalk.
Every week, the completed work of the participants was checked -
Week 1
351 participants x 15 posts/person = 5265 posts
Week 2
78 participants x 15 posts = 1170 posts
Week 3
77 participants x 15 posts = 1155 posts
Week 4
81 participants x 15 posts = 1215 posts
Week 5
81 participants x 15 posts = 1215 posts
Total amount of posts: 10 020 posts with information about Free TON, which saw 3 187 193 crypto users (Bitcointalk - 2 869 852 forum members, Altcoinstalks - 55 576 forum members, Cryptotalk - 261 765 forum members)
Each bounty campaign participant made same actions and have same result and proof-of-work:
- every week 15 posts with information about Free TON (sometime even more posts) (main contribution)
- installed Surf TON, activated wallet and using it (main contribution)
- subscribed https://t.me/ton_crystal_news (additional contribution)
- sign the Declaration of Decentralization (additional contribution)
- subscribed https://twitter.com/CommunityTon (additional contribution)
- registered on Free TON forum (additional contribution)
- active Free TON users (additional contribution)
What other statistical information must be provided in order to answer all the questions? I may have missed something.
and selected member was high qualification member. Bounty Manager ask high reputation with minimal condition to participate in free ton signature campaign. so sad when someone said we just register to get TON and ignores potential advertisements in each post
Some overly violent reaction to an inadequate question. A person just thinks extremely linearly, almost like in the army))).
@XLR25t, you can take a stroll to Bitcointalk service board and see how signature campaigns are done even more popular projects engage in such campaigns because they know the value of wearing signature on the forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0 ( A link to the board for more clarification and scrutiny).
Thank you, Daria. You have already made a great effort and the signature campaign has attracted many due to the good planning and perfect execution. Good luck, I wish the project.
Do you realise I never heard of TON crystal until it was listed on bitcointalk and bounty thread, that’s the power of forum and hiring a reputable members for signature campaign on forums.
Check this thread on bitcointalk, you will realize signature space are been offered in form of service, hence the Free TON must look the efforts of those who have promoted their company on different forum that lasted for about a month wearing their images and tex at the same time following all the instructions.
TON crystal needed awareness, it has been delivered on different forum. It’s now your turn to pay those who deserve the payment otherwise it will be unfair which will lead a negative reputation to your project, the company and the management.
I am super disappointed to see this kind of act from the Free TON platform. The bitcointalk campaign was really something. A lot of people got to know about ton. Imagine, there were reputable Legendary members wearing the signature for all weeks. I don’t see why making payment to a little number of people (who did their job properly) is a big deal.
The same situation. I started to learn free TON infrastructure only after saw it on Altcoinstalks.
This is the part where I fear for the Free TON community. It’s impossible to not pay bitcointalk users (especially reputable ones) and still have a project in good shape. It obviously means trouble. I hope they make the right decision while it’s still theirs to make.
it was a large and successful company, and it brought a lot of benefits to the project.
there was a very strict selection of participants and people with a only high reputation on the forums were selected