Virtual Hero/Spokesperson of Free TON

:grinning: :bouvet_island:
-1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0
The philosophy is good, but you took Yoda and made him the Free TON hero. No originality here. Points for description
0:b1af91c ···· ee44983e7
Not original. It is something like Yoda + Buddha
0:f4f2113 ···· a36834c05
It is a pity that the design of the character is not original, it could have been a decent application

Судьи пишут, что моя работа не оригинальна. Но при этом закрывают глаза на откровенный плагиат. У меня две мысли: 1) Судьи заинтересованы чтобы эти работы прошли 2) Судьи оценивали некачественно работы. Если судьям нужно больше времени, можно продлить голосование, ведь работ много. Я использовал в своем герое черты Будды, Конфуция, Мастера Йоды. Я приложу исходники своей работы. Я надеюсь на более качественный и справедливый отбор работ.

3 Likes

-1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0
I like background story but cannot connect to character. A good example of a robot that works, look at submission #26
Судья ссылается и приводит в пример работу-плагиат. Отличное судейство. Почему судья не смог проверить на уникальность работу №26?! Остаются вопросы.


В защиту уникальности своей работы могу приложить исходники своей работы.

3 Likes

Я конечно понимаю, что работа наша сделана в попыхах, за 2 дня буквально и согласен что мало информации, но …
-1: 046374 ···· a8f25cba0
2 балла
Симпатичный маленький парень. Мне нравится изменение настроения. Но это 1. слишком просто; 2. Недостаточно информативен; 3. Недостаток многофункциональности.
-1: e70a86 ···· 5c1532990
2 балла
очень грубый и общий
0: b1af91c ···· ee44983e7
1 балл
Слишком простой дизайн. Слишком краткое описание
0: f4f2113 ···· a36834c05
3 балла
По сравнению с другими работами это 3

Что значит по сравнению с другими работами ? он оценивает или сравнивает ?) Слишком простой дизайн, а им нужен Оптимус Прайм на картинке , который потом в реализации будет огого сколько стоить ? ) Далее, очень Грубый и Общий ) посмотрите кому не лень 69 работу, где он грубый и общий? ) Просто на наш взгляд , персонаж который выступает в роли помощника для комьюнити не должен быть замудрен, он должен легко восприниматься любой категории людей, оформление и описание да, страдает из-за нехватки времени, усилия были больше на персонажа ) Я не против поставленных баллов , но некоторые комментарии конечно дают повод задуматься )

3 Likes

100% согласен (минимум 20 символов)

Посмотрел заявку. С жюри согласен честно говоря. Слабая заявка, Имхо.

Так я и не против поставленных оценок, я написал про комментарии к ним ) По сравнению с другими работами это 3. Он не должен был сравнивать, а оценить, пускай даже на 1 балл, не важно, но в пример написать: слабо развита идея персонажа, его возможности и в этом духе ) я про это писал ) Я согласен что заявка слаба, мало описания и т.д , спору нет, но некоторые комментарии к оценке не совсем верны )

4 Likes

мне очень понравился персонаж

Any assessment is essentially a comparison. Here, personally, I expected that any judge would first get acquainted with all the works, make notes in the draft, and then directly evaluate the work. And here it is decided along the way. And the risk that a member of the jury simply will not have any backlash for an adequate assessment of the latest works is very high.

And that also causes another problem. The first works in the list may get low rates just in order to leave some backlash for next works.

2 Likes

Мне тоже нравится) А учитывая что по времени у Вас было 2 дня, так вообще отлично :slight_smile:

Никак не могу найти количество судьей на конкурсе. Неужели только 5?

Если да, то я не совсем понимаю как 5 человек могут оценить и выбрать персонажа который будет лицом FreeTon.

Если говорить о децентрализированном подходе, не должно ли тогда все сообщество голосовать/выбирать персонажа?

1 Like

Тридцать два члена судейской коллегии

2 Likes

Hello everyone!)
I really want to re-note here the information about my application and the way it was considered!
submission 55 - link - https://gov.freeton.org/submission?proposalAddress=0:2b609211d156cc8459a20e5c90e50b8725b6300a0a8bf34b331cdd15db0c10b3&submissionId=55

Like all the participants - I designed a character SPECIALLY for FreeTON, inspired by it!
I would really like my character to take one of the leading positions in the competition and be considered for further development!

Yesterday I checked the results of the vote and was terribly happy because my hero was in one of the leading positions!
However, today I received two “ones!” (points).
at the moment my application, like (only!) some others - has FIVE votes.

Judging by the jury votes and rating status, certain doubts creep into my mind about the fairness of the scoring! as in the leading positions (by average and total number of points) there are applications that have only three votes!

I request you to carefully check on the wallets of the judges who gave, specifically on my example, unreasonably low scores! - for the participation of themselves (or their representatives / teams) in this contest!

My creation (my hero!) took a lot of energy and working time from me! and he’s not bad enough to get one point !!

If they themselves took part in the contest (what I suspect), they should understand how much time and effort it takes!

3 Likes

What about this jury?

-1:e70a86 ···· 5c1532990

It seems he is highly incompetent and prejudiced. He rated with “9” submission (number 20) without any images (sketch was one of the condition to this contest). And he gives like 1-3 to many really good works. WTF???

5 Likes

I didn’t tell anything about my work yet here. I’ve spent a lot of time with friend of mine to come up with unique idea. I got 3pts average.

One of the comments:
-1:046374 ···· a8f25cba0
Understand your reasoning, but you may have overthought this. Cartoon-like element is not a fit I think. Good description
Contest rules asked about sketch so we Did a sketch. What does Cartoon-like means??? Does Juror ever draw anything? Did he read contest requirements? Why almost all of the unique work (non-robot, non-crystal, non-superhero) got lowest scores?

The saddest part, non of the Judges didn’t rate the Idea of decentralized character.

3 Likes

For me to show that the character is decentralized - is very hard mission.
But you have accomplished that - great job :+1:

Also the idea is unique (not just sound waves or something like that). The character is “alive” :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

I would also like to join and support the commentators above!

An absolutely similar story happened to me!

A huge amount of time, effort and “artistic suffering” was spent on creating my character!

And I, frankly, myself am madly delighted with him!

The quality of work / drawing / and the originality of the embodiment are at the highest level!

(sub 63 - link - https://gov.freeton.org/submission?proposalAddress=0:2b609211d156cc8459a20e5c90e50b8725b6300a0a8bf34b331cdd15db0c10b3&submissionId=63)

And suddenly I get feedback that it’s too childish!

At the same time, an example (kitties) was given in the conditions of the contest. - my character is perfect for such a development of events for FreeTON!

To remove the “childishness” for it’s subsequent development (in which I intended to take an active part), it would be possible to make the hero a rough male voice! and it would even have great support from the modern community!

And if the character “dragon” is typical - so, he is typical for myths / fairy tales / cartoons - and precisely because people adore them so much (which I also indicated in my submission) !!! - give an example of at least one use of a dragon character in the crypto community !?

I do not think that people who are interested in the development of the FreeTON “to offer state-of-the-art technology” vote in this competition!

who, for all that, have no personal interest in giving extremely low points, BUT only for half of the submissions!

Crazy about my character! I believe in him and his joint future with FreeTON! and I will do my best to make him a leader!

2 Likes

Dear judges, if you are reading the forum, please pay attention to some inaccuracies in your wording, Plagiarism - it is when the hero is similar to the existing original or modified, and the work / hero in our case, taken in its entirety and ready-made from another project or the author of other competitions - it is called Fraud and such work I propose to disqualify from the participants at all. Please be precise in your wording and there will be less criticism.

4 Likes

На мой взгляд победить должен кто-то анимешный.

2 Likes

judges love anime and cartoons … so they would write in General requirements: we need an anime girl naked :smiley: the representative of Free Ton is a cartoon woman, lol. It’s good that not gay Anton

3 Likes