Proposal: Add new initial members as jury members


Recently new Initial members have been added to the Free TON Community. They now have the right to vote on proposals, but they are not yet judges. This proposal proposes to add them to the members.




On-chain voting


In the strive to decentralize Free TON, so should the jury come from the community at large. This will help achieve the goal of decentralized governance 2.0 faster.

Rights and duties

New initial members will get the right to be a juror for each Main Gov Free TON contest going forward and get the same reward as each contest describes for jurors. In order to get the jury reward described in each contest, the juror must do the following:

  1. Each juror should review each contest and its requirements here under “Contests”.
  2. The juror should review each contestant’s submission (uploaded in .PDF format) and determine if each submission is within the scope of his or her understanding to judge it, and then vote as follows:
    a. If outside of juror competence, the juror should vote to “Abstain”.
    b. If within juror competence, the juror should vote on a scale of 0-to-10 with 0 representing least and 10 representing most qualified submissions.
    c. If the submission is inappropriate, the PDF file is unopenable or corrupt, etc., the juror should vote not to score at all.
  3. The juror should provide constructive feedback in the appropriate field describing the reason for their score.

New jury members should familiarize themselves with the Jury Guideliness.

As any civic duty dictates, every juror must remain objective to the best of his/her abilities in regard to voting, i.e., stick to the facts and the facts only, leaving any personal feelings aside.


Fully support :+1: you are welcome .

1 Like

Hello. This is logical.

I support 100%. Thank you