Михаэль ты накосячил лично, не увертывайся а признай. Лучше признать ошибку и попытаться исправить, а не быть упертым как баран. Конкурс был создан тобой и отговорки “надо было смотреть в другом месте” не принимаются. Ты мог в любой момент отредакировать информацию, чтобы исправить свой недочет и не вводить в заблуждение. Конкурсов будет еще много и первый блин комом. Ничего страшного, поучавствуем в других. Тем более лично свои идеи я не очень хотел отдавать. Наверное это к лучшему. Будет для каждого уроком, что при создании конкурса надо конролировать его, а не пускать по течению.
Вспомните пожалуйста первый урок информатики. Информация должна быть достоверной.
No comments…
Децентрализованное сообщество- ЭТО ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ ЛЮДЕЙ.
А еще хороший урок жизни - рассчитывать нужно только на самого себя. Никто ничего вам на блюдечке не принесет
К вам нет доверия после этого
There is no reason to compare rewards for contests to token distributions to initial validators. Initial validators launched the network, and they did so at their own risk and time before there was a Free TON. In the centralized world they would be compared to initial investors. Facebook’s 1st investment was $500k. Now that’s worth hundreds of millions to those investors, and since then, no matter who buys Facebook stock, they will never see returns as large as those initial investors, and that is fair and just. It’s the wrong comparison to make. No contests will ever deliver the same amount of rewards as initial validators received. It’s just plain common sense.
1 Like
Message is not editable. Link to work: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16HERPNnB3gU7S2SthG4o8WiVa0Yqbtd4/view?usp=sharing.
Telegram: @Anderkos
I see that the submission 32 is rejected with the comment “All I see is what “someone should do”. What will YOU do? No KPIs. Not a fit.”
Are the Jurors aware that this Contest is dedicated to BM Program Development, not participating as an Ambassador? We should not do anything here except for suggesting our ideas, don`t we?
Hi.
There should be Program, but not a list with the ideas set.
Tasks
To summarize the best practices for creating a Brand Masters program. Your submission should be structured as follows:
- Brand Masters program description.
- Brand Masters roles distribution.
- Determining the number of Brand Masters needed.
- A system for monitoring the fulfilment of Brand Masters’ duties.
- Identification of regional communities and language groups for community leadership by Brand Masters.
- The main tasks that Brand Masters can perform on a common basis and each in their language group.
- Terms of token rewards for tasks performed.
It is a better explanation, however there is one more rejection "All submissions must contain the contestant’s contact information, including a Telegram ID. Sorry"
I agree that the submission looks poor, and it seems to be an attempt to multiply submissions from one person, but but the lack of Telegram ID should not be a reson to reject it! You should have made Telegram ID a mandatory field when submiting in that case!
This question is for the jury.
@AlexM укажите свой username в Telegram или почту, по которой с вами связываться - это обязательное требование конкурса
1 Like
2 Likes
Why not all the judges voted, someone has 8 votes, someone has 6, this greatly affects the final score. Where can I see who is judging us? The community must know their heroes by sight. Some members of the jury are too subjective, participants in competitions should have the opportunity to communicate with them in case of disputable situations. We have a free, decentralized community, right?
2 Likes
yes, this is not good to see that not all judges voted, maybe the voting period will be prolonged - hope so
3 Likes
Hello!
At the moment we have no information from the jury members for this contest.
I believe that many members of the jury did not have time to vote. As they have had a huge load in previous contests. For the Ambassadors, it looks like the same situation will be.
Previously, the deadlines were extended for many contests (voting). How will it be here, we do not know yet.
We are waiting for information on this issue.
3 Likes