There is truth in these words
All we have now in FreeTon is 11k accounts, which means about 3-4k real users: each user can have several accounts, personal service accounts for replenishment in exchangers.
Cointelegraph’s partnership with 10 thousand views per week did not bring TON activity; the growth of accounts remained practically unchanged.
For development, the project needs to increase liquidity in affordable ways, thriftily, without harm to the project. We offer just a solution for improving the ecosystem, almost the entire allocated budget will convert into new users.
3 Likes
Ok… I agree with others. What’s the 150K for?
-
You already integrated as you state. Show us the KPIs. Marketing comes later. Show us the results, then we talk promotion as the next step.
-
Quoting you: “Trade volume will become visible to everyone; we are in stage of connecting to CMC; we cannot share screens until that moment.” Ok. Excellent! We will wait to see those stats and then determine if the proposal is worth it (after the 150K ask dissolves into something more palatable).
-
Reward program a good idea. Let’s see 1 and 2 above details and then talk numbers. At the moment this is 40K according to your ask. That I can deal with AFTER the above are clearly visible.
-
Advertising. Please see point 1 above.
-
Cashback great idea. But again, see above.
-
Implementation comes after integration. You integrated. Please let the community test and see the results.
-
Probably the worst thing you can do to attract community consensus is to bring in the argument that “others got this or that.” The secretaries who brought Bill Gates his lunch when he worked out of his parents’ garage got Microsoft stock as compensation. You cannot get a secretarial job at MCSFT today with a $10M/year salary. Not everyone “gets what others got”. We are an evolving network. Each new proposal is judged based on the latest lessons learned. Up front token asks are now very carefully put to the fire test. Unless you’re WeChat or Facebook or Cointelegraph or something, comparing is not a good idea. It will simply be rejected. The idea is to help your proposal evolve to something the community is willing to taste.
Just trying to help.
I do see some value in this if it can be formally justified with ALL the details.
I will also add that it is good that this proposal is P2P/OTC, because Free TON never has, does not, and never-ever will ask to be listed on any exchange. There is no central governance. there are no decision makers. What exchanges do is up to those exchanges. No exchange will ever be approached by Free TON (because there is no one to do it). Think, “How would I list Bitcoin?” Same concept. Free TON is decentralized. No entity. No nothing like that.
So please remove all mention of paying to be listed and just leave the user metrics. That is the only thing that matters. And then please consider those metrics against your ask.
Thank you for your proposal.
4 Likes
This is our partnership analytical report prepared for the “Analytical reports about partners” contest.
Disclaimer:
Present analytic report is completely based on the data available in the open sources. Due to ethical reasons, personal contact details are partially hidden. The report structures all the publically available information and flags potential interdependancies and inconsistencies. Present report should not be regarded as a verdict or proof of any kind. It is an initial open source intelligence: not all the information gathered or conclusions made can be regarded as 100% legit.
ENG:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RyXqvdMnju8068kBdDz7Bb-KbKZnHT9j/view?usp=sharing
RUS:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KoQVVOCM2-DVi7-jqaUKthesnec67Ais/view?usp=sharing
#Partnersreport
#Garantex
3 Likes
Знаю эту биржу, в принципе объемы у них очень даже неплохие! Поддерживаю