Main purpose: A catalog of works by winners of Free TON contests. In the future, this catalog will be filled with all the works that have practical value and won prizes. A fast and easy website which allows you to access the necessary information about the contest easily and joyfully.
Optional: Adding works outside of the prize places, but with practical value.
Requirements
The website has easy navigation by categories, search by keywords. There should be different categories to demonstrate the functionality of the site. Structure (eg. SubGov->Contest->Works). Tags: optional.
The language of the catalog is English.
User-friendly, simple and intuitive UI / UX. Adaptive design for all types of devices.
The catalog contains at least 10 content units (1 content unit = 1 contest including the works of the winners of this contest with link to PDF / or other files).
The catalog is located on a domain / subdomain on the Internet and is available for viewing.
The sources on GitHub are presented, or the solutions used (CMS, plugins, etc.) are listed. The license is specified in the solutions used. For example: GNU Public License.
All winners provide the files of the website upon request.
Design and style
You can use the “classic” logo and style of Free TON.
You can offer your own version of the logo and style for the catalog.
In terms of the logo and style, freedom and creativity are allowed.
The main thing is the functional result: a convenient and fast website.
Rewards
1st place…………………………………………….15 000 TON (7 500 + 7 500)
2nd place……………………………………………12 000 TON (6 000 + 6 000)
3rd place…………………………………………….10 000 TON (5 000 + 5 000)
4th place ……………………………………………8 000 TON
5th place………………………………………….…5 000 TON
For Top-3, vesting for two months in equal parts of 50/50. Only submissions with an average score equal to or more than 4.0 can get a reward.
Jury rewards
5000 TONs will be divided equitably between all jurors who vote and provide feedback based on their votes’ quantity and quality. Both voting and feedback are mandatory to collect this reward.
The percentage of tokens awarded to the jury will be distributed based on the number of votes each juror casts.
For example, if one juror votes 50 times and another juror votes 5 times, the juror who votes 50 times will get 10 times more tokens than the juror who votes 5 times.
Feedback is mandatory in order to collect any rewards.
Voting
Jurors will vote for your submission. Jurors whose team(s) intend to participate in this contest by providing submissions of their own lose their right to vote in this contest. Otherwise, the vote of such a member of the jury is not taken into account.
Each juror will vote by rating each submission on a scale of 1 to 10 or can choose to reject or abstain.
Jurors should provide feedback to submissions.
Duplicate, sub par, incomplete or inappropriate submissions will be rejected.
Each judge takes into account the evaluation criteria.
Evaluation criteria
The criteria are necessary to identify the quality of the work and transparency of the judging. The maximum possible score is 10. It consists of the following components.
Minimum of 10 content units: 0 - 1 point. (0 points if there is less content.)
User-friendly interface, easy to search and navigate: 0 - 2 points. (0 - there is no convenient navigation or search capability. 1 - There is a convenient menu and search. 2 - Convenient to use and easy to find information on any device).
Adaptive design: 0 - 2 points. (0 - the design is not adaptive, 1 - not adaptive on all devices. 2 - looks good on any device).
Page load speed: 0 - 2 points. Google page speed service. (50+ for desktop and mobile devices - 2 points. Less than 50 - 1 point. Less than 25 - 0 points.)
The subjective opinion of the jury: 0-3 points. Evaluate the design, usability, speed, and overall impression.
Procedural reminders to all contestants
All submissions must be accessible for the Jury to open and view, so please double-check your submission. If the submission is inaccessible or does not fit the criteria described, jurors may reject the submission.
Contestants must submit their work before the closing of the filing of applications. If not submitted on time, the submission will not count.
All submissions must contain the contestant’s contact information, preferably a Telegram username by which jurors can verify that the submission belongs to the individual who submitted it. If not, jurors may reject your submission.
The content published in the forum and the provided PDF file should not differ, except for formatting. Otherwise, jurors may reject the submission.
If your submission has links to the work performed, the content of those links must have the contestant’s contact details, preferably a Telegram username, so jurors can match it and verify whom the work belongs to. If not, jurors may reject your submission.
Multiple submissions:
Each contestant has the right to provide several submissions if they contain different approaches to the contest problem’s solving. However, if works are not unique enough or differ just in insignificant details, jurors may reject such repeating submissions.
If the contestant wants to make an additional submission that overrides the one previously published, he must inform the Jury about this fact and indicate the correct revision to assess. In this case, only the indicated work will count. If the contestant hasn’t indicated the updated submission as the correct one, only the first one will count, the Jury will reject all the others.
Я против php frameworks и против этого языка в проекте.
Эта устаревшая технология, зачем ее использовать когда есть reactjs и vue не говоря уже о asp.net
Outdated technology? Jokes aside? The main language of the Ton project: C ++ - is it also deprecated and should I have chosen C #? This is a long-standing controversy and I don’t see any real arguments against PHP other than that it is fashionable to use NodeJs, etc.
I’m sure you won’t be able to argue that this language is “deprecated”? Just a subjective opinion?
Я могу и утверждаю, что php устарел, использование его в шаблоне глупо, это серверный язык.
В данном конкурсе требуется шаблон или дизайн, я пока не понял что.
В 2021 году в стандарт написания шаблона входит html5 и javascript то, что обрабатывается на стороне клиента.
А вот бэкенд уже можно реализовать на php (api, laravel), вы же хотите использовать php для создания шаблона и обращаться на прямую к базе данных как я понял.
По поводу C++ он не устарел, одна только технология программирования с шаблонами чего стоит.
C# не использовал, но сравнивать его с С++ глупо.
It looks like you have a very low level of knowledge. You recommend .NET to me, claiming you know nothing about C #. Below is a list of obvious truths about which technologies are supported by browsers.
Using PHP in the frontend is really stupid. The very assumption of such a use of it is stupid.
Comparison of C # and C ++ is more than relevant, C # is declared a replacement and “killer C ++”. Many programmers have switched to this language. Comparing them causes holy wars among programmers.
In fact, I would like to know the opinion of someone more competent. Sory.
The result that we want to see is a fast and convenient website, a catalog of the winners ’ works. What it will be based on is the choice of the participants. (the use of CMS is not prohibited) The final result will be evaluated based on the requirements and criteria of the contest.
Результат, который мы хотим видеть, - это быстрый и удобный сайт, каталог работ победителей. То, на чем он будет сделан - это выбор участников. (CMS использовать не запрещено) Оцениваться будет итоговый результат исходя из требований и критериев конкурса.
Amendment to the contest 17 Web & Design: Winners Works Catalog & #16 Web & Design – Identity.
Type
Proposal
Procedural remarks:
To prepare a complete ready Winners Works Catalog is required to extend the deadline for the submission of entries.
Change reward in # 16 Web & Design - Identity due to the many large analytics of the works of the contestants
Change:
Extend the deadline for submission of competitive works until June 30, 2021 at 23:59 UTC
Extend the voting period until July 14, 2021 at 23:59 UTC
Increase the rewards to the jury members for judging two contests #17 Web & Design: Winners Works Catalog & #16 Web & Design – Identity contest for 5000 TON Сrystal in the each contest.
Это полностью на усмотрение конкурсанта. Должна быть удобная навигация по разделам (сабговам, конкурсам, категориям). Должен быть поиск по ключевым словам. Хорошая скорость загрузки страницы. В требованиях основные критерии обозначены.
Design and style
You can use the “classic” logo and style of Free TON.
We need move forward to decentralization. Please include to this contest smart contracts and DeBots. From which place we need to parse contest results? - I beleave we need parse them from blockchain itself
P.S Oh, I see, contest already running. Let’s discuss it after
Hello to everyone, I’m new in the freeton community but I would like to participate in this contest
I had a look into structure of previouse contests and I realized I didn’t fully understand requirements .
Firstly, We have in requirements : “A catalog of works by winners of Free TON contests. In the future, this catalog will be filled with all the works that have practical value and won prizes.” but below written that we can add not winners works “Adding works outside of the prize places, but with practical value.”.
So, Will be enough to have only works by winners? And will it somehow affect “The subjective opinion of the jury” ?
The second question is about statistics. Should we show information about points, who were like a juror in the specific contest and how many points did jurors put on submissions?
