Да стоковые изображения надо тщательнее отслеживать
Очень глубоко копать в разумные сроки нереально. Я тратил минут 10 на каждую работу, и то это заняло пару дней. И я понимал, что еще есть стоковые работы, но пруфов быстро не находилось.
Слабак, все реально! За день управился, нужно учиться поисковыми приложениями пользоваться и применять их в разных браузерах, чего нет в гугле, есть в яндексе и наоборот.
wow nice, happy christmas day for 2020 contest awesome
2 балла за такую сложность, серьезно?
Скоро в прямом эфире будем наблюдать как 90% получают меньше 6, а призовой пул уходит для 20-30 открыток
The sad observation already at the beginning. Blatant underestimation or overestimation of scores, not explainable by anything other than affiliated judgement. Even a “matter of taste” cannot explain such a spread.
Посмотрел на оценки первого судьи. И возник вопрос. А судья в дизайне компетентен? Или просто школьник лайкает нравится/не нравится картинка?
Guys, there’s a lot more plagiarism out there.
Why do judges work so badly?
Согласен, плагиата много с 6+
Судьи, вот вам в помощь https://searchenginereports.net/reverse-image-search
I have a funny situation, my materials are already being used in the official Telegram channel. I do not mind at all, I am even pleased, since I consider this a good indicator of my work. With which the judges do not quite agree. I hope that the judges understood that I passed all parts of the competition, but twitter blocked my account. Please be more professional.
Hello, friends!
What about the contestant 238? The judges’ scores look strange from the contest rules:
Unique design, no templates or stock solutions
At the moment, there is a reaction from only three judges:
I sincerely don’t understand, the judges don’t know about GTA or… was everyone allowed to do this?)
Or the uniqueness in the crystal, which in this picture is not a crystal, but a diamond?
Let me explain - this is an image from GTA San Andreas (game)
Twitter Posts 1: https://twitter.com/Deadpoo16260690/status/1341120160585814016?s=20
Twitter Post 2: https://twitter.com/Deadpoo16260690/status/1341122050123939841?s=20
Twitter Post 3: https://twitter.com/Deadpoo16260690/status/1341122346430595074?s=20
These are the cards I created. this is the submission: Free TON Community
Two persons have rejected the submission saying it’s a stock image. In just one submission I provided three greeting cards. The source file is also provided in the submission pdf and people says it a stock image for all the three cards. This was my first submission on freeton. I saw many submission where people literally have used pictures from the internet and wrote Merry Christmas and they have been awarded 8-10 points. One person commented that someone just morphed the head of a person from GTA and attached a ton crystal and he has been awarded 10 points.
Here’s what I have gotten!
All I took was the image of the moon. Apart from that everyone stole Santa/it’s sleigh/horses from websites like freepick etc. This was my first submission. I don’t know how people vote here? Can anyone vote on the submissions(I can see ‘Cast your vote Button’) or freeton has hired people from a design background to vote on the submissions. I request the people who are voting people do justice to the submissions. Very disappointed.
You can write about these works here. In Figma, such works are in a red frame. You can help search for plagiarism, I think so.
The contest rules state that:
Unique design, no templates or stock solutions
Above, there was a discussion about how red frames will affect the jury’s assessment.
Only the jury votes. Their list was in the discussion too.
lol…aren’t you ashamed to say such things?
Hi sir,
if we go by this, every submission can be labelled as plagiarized. Many things from any greeting card can be found online… as I mentioned.
I suggest you try to understand the difference by looking at work number 15. Here is a screenshot for You.
(This is not my picture) What’s from Stock/Internet here?
The ratings are very different!