Of course I’m happy for the guys, but those who passed the time tracking the time at the siege and did not get into the first 20 places will not get anything, as it is not fair.
3 Likes
yes, this is not a very honest approach. Rather honest for those who did not have time. But for those who managed to apply and also spent time for this contest and did not win a prize, this is very upsetting
1 Like
Maybe then everyone needs to send 1000 coins. Because I also did the job for several days. But I looked after the application deadlines. And my mindfulness ruined me?
1 Like
@daernhii @Aleksandr there is no solution that will fit all.
The problem of those who missed the deadline due to mistake of deployment time, didn’t have a chance to show their work at all.
1 Like
I agree, but such a decision infringes upon the rights of those who tried to be attentive and did not take the prize. And they also put in enough time to work. It needs to be discussed
I think the best would be to not send those who did not submit even though it was a mistake of the deployment time. Other participants were also confused like mentioned in the thread by one of the participants already but we all kept checking the timings to get the idea of the estimated time remaining to do the submission. gov.freeton.org always shows the time left and there is a stopwatch which keeps running. I believe it was a mistake from the participants as well. And this will be fairer.
Because those who submitted on time but did not make it to top 20 will not get anything and those who submitted after the deadline, even though their submission was not good, will get 1000 crystals without getting judged by the juries because of their own carelessness.
Deadline mentioned was incorrect for everyone not just for those who submitted it after the deadline. The only difference is, other participants were careful and kept their eye on the gov.freeton.org.
1 Like
You are too strict. I am for world peace. If latecomers are awarded (and this is a good decision), then it is impossible in this case to deprive the attention of participants who are attentive to the conditions and followed the time of submission of applications
I would not write this, but you know, it was actually a difficult contest. Therefore, such a decision would be correct
1 Like
Haha I wish I was late.
3 Likes
where can we see the leaderboard and winners list?
2 Likes
0:d243dc85aab7323b9906ba4bc4258256be7eb504459f38d9ddf3def1f4d7570f
2 Likes
Hah, for my 22 place it will be better to post my work on 9 October… hah WTF?
3 Likes
Tonworld, what kind of inattention are we talking about? It seems that you are starting to forget that this link is in an unobvious place and not everyone knows about it (gov.freeton.org). And in the terms of the competition, the deadline was specified on October 9, the end of the day. I ask you to think more objectively.
2 Likes
My Free TON address:
ton://0:918ade8c5024a1ca7059d7da4d43e9fdf48bdda3dc3dc45c1bf16c3f4818a717
2 Likes
You won’t stop replying to my posts, will you? You & your gang have ruined all the good submissions & took all the TONs already. What else do you want, here? Talking with someone like you is totally pointless. You don’t even know how to behave online and speak to others on a public forum. Sounds like no one has taught you.
Do yourself a favor. Get out of your cave, sometimes. Go out, meet people, read some books and learn how to talk in a public forum.
Look! I know people like you. People like you have an extremely big mouth when they talk online but when it comes to talking in person in real life, your mouth becomes extremely smaller (goldfish size mouth). Actually, you’re a keyboard fighter.
Let me tell you that having a moderator badge in front of your username doesn’t make you the owner of Free TON blockchain. ok?
Again, it’s so funny that you ask for my submission number while you’ve already seen it in my previous posts in this article in the voting days & poured the scores of 2 or 3 with ugly comments on my submission. Now you’re ACTING like you don’t know my submission number? :)))) Nice try!
But remember this: I don’t give a flying DAMN about your comments & scores on my submission. I’m a designer & I know what I’m doing.
There’s a 10 days period for voting and you and your gang spend 9 days for making plans on how to ruin other submissions & spend the last day on actually ruining the submission in favor of yourself & your friends. You may think you’re too smart and no one would realize this but please don’t compare your IQ to others.
AND AGAIN! read my posts again. I didn’t just talk about my own submission. All the good ones has got low scores from you. If you can’t see other posts by other participants here, who are complaining about judging, just take off your sunglasses! Maybe you see better then! 
I won’t check forum until the GOV 2.0. So if you have any comments & want me to talk with you like yourself, this is my Telegram ID: @mooni121
I’m waiting for you there. It’s a public forum & many ladies & gentlemen, here. Show me what you got on Telegram. (Of course if you don’t afraid of coming out of your cave).
By the way! Say hi to Jeffrey Abstain! ( your friend who abstained all the submissions in order to get effortless TONs).
:)))))))
Adios!
7 Likes
The same thoughts, I can’t say better.
Three bad marks (2-3 points) a few hours before the end of the vote, I can’t believe it’s a coincidence.
2 Likes
Как говаривал великий … Я так не думаю )
Guys, support the proposal: Proposal: consolation prizes for contestants who are not included in the main prize pool
In the proposal, I want to convey the meaning that complex contests need a more flexible reward system
I also believe that blind rewards for participants who are late to submit an application is a violation of the rights of other participants and the community should look at the issue more broadly than just reward latecomers. I don’t know - increase the number of prizes, or to approach the issue in another way. I do not apply myself (because my application took a place closer to 40), but the participants near the prize places would have met such an initiative, I think, with joy.
1 Like
Where have they posted the leaderboard?
Your words sound too rash. The guys who passed their work on October 9 are not late. The contest terms and conditions specify the end of the business day on October 9 deadline. That’s what we were counting on. And I didn’t know about the time counter, I think as well as my colleagues who passed the work on October 9. In this situation, we feel cheated. Therefore, we ask for compensation for an error in specifying the terms.
Your work received judges ’ ratings, but ours did not…
2 Likes