This is not fair. Jury member 0:b1af91c ···· ee44983e7 has provided his feedback on my submission saying “Not so original, seems mostly taken from template” and based on that he has given me only 2 points out of 10.
My submission may not be the best one but it is definitely not worth 2 points and labelling it as a copied or template is definitely not accepted.
These jurors do not even bother asking/clarifying the participants once. Telegram IDs are provided for some reason.
Also, who is this last guy? He is abstaining every submission almost. If he did not want to judge properly or provide feedback, why did he even joined the jury’s team? Just to earn crystals? He even marked Abstain on those submissions who have gotten the best scores from other jury members.
Yes, It’s a decentralized community and these jurors have a vote rights. They decided so. It will be more interesting when Governance 2.0 happen, because EVERYONE will have a vote.
How can I collect proof about this juror?
I don’t even know his name. Should I be a hacker and hack into his device to collect his chats about upvoting his friends & downvoting others?
Roman, I don’t know if you’re a judge in this contest or not. If not, and you haven’t seen submissions, you can open & view all of them. Not many! there are 61 of them!
Just take a look at all of them! Except few submissions which are empty, all the good submissions have scored low points & the bad ones have got high scores!
I’m not just talking about my own submission, here! I have opened all of them and there are a lot of good ones! But they have been downvoted!
It doesn’t need to be a designer to distinguish good works from bad works. Even a blind person can understand there’s a misjudging act is going on in this contest.
First of all, no one is going to give you the juror’s identities. That can lead to danger for the jurors. This is a decentralized blockchain that does not reveal privacy of its members. That’s Free TON’s strength.
Second, no one is going to tell anyone what they should do and how they should vote. That is everyone’s individual right. You have your opinion, others have theirs. You think some of the work is great. I looked at some of them. There are a lot of horrible submissions. But that’s it. It’s an opinion. Not everybody has to share yours.
What you’re asking for is that your opinion should somehow count more or better than others. Think about what you’re saying.
Everyone thinks that his work should be given 10 points. But let be realists. If you have some proof that the juror did it special, make a topic and explain it why it happened, etc. It’s a decentralized community, every juror has his own opinion.
