Burn the giver!

Type:

Proposal

Short description:

This is a proposal to burn the rest of coins Everscale in the giver: Everscale Blockchain Explorer

Motivation:

  1. Eliminate the risk of coins falling from the giver into evil hands;

  2. Eliminate the risk of price dumping after coins falling from the giver into evil hands;

  3. Eliminate investors’ fear of coins falling from the giver into evil hands and price dumping after it.

By this proposal Everscale will jump into the next phase of growth: from «airdrop» system with contests and partnerships, that turned out to be useless in most cases to natural growth.

4 Likes

Eliminate evil. Evilscale!

I support this way to survive, but maybe not to burn giver at all, but to revise it’s politics and make it more aimed to the result

For first, we can freeze it’s money for 1 decade, for example. Next, we can revise amount of this prizes.

But I am participate your mood in this situation, we have something to do with it!!

Type:

Proposal

Short description:

This is a proposal to burn the rest of coins Everscale in the giver: Everscale Blockchain Explorer

Motivation:

  1. Eliminate the risk of coins falling from the giver into evil hands;

  2. Increase the number of foundations willing to enter the project;

  3. Community is tired of an irresponsible distribution of coins;

  4. Community is tired of 2 year long price dumping.

By this proposal Everscale will jump into the next phase of growth: from «airdrop» system with contests and partnerships, that turned out to be useless in most cases to natural growth.

I don’t agree we should burn it all, but something needs to change.

Look at this graph. Not much needs to be said. The grant system sadly to say has been a failure. ICO probably should have been the way to go from the start but its too late now. We need to rethink our approach on how to move forward. Whether that involves burning a good chunk of the giver or not idk. But something needs change. The system has been abused by evil actors. For every 1 EVER spent on something good, 10 have been spent on scams/dead projects. Soon there will come a time where new comers will take one glance at that chart and not give EVER a second look (no matter how good the tech becomes).

1 Like

Many investors are put off by the giver, because there is a huge risk that it can be used not for the benefit of the network. The proposal is not devoid of common sense.

1 Like