Analytics & Support Sub-governance DeWorkflow

Contest Proposal: Analytics & Support Sub-governance DeWorkflow


This contest was created to motivate active participants of the Analytics & Support Sub-governance who write contests, organize activity, and make the work of the Sub-governance possible. Let’s encourage them to continue working!

This contest was created to reward those who have contributed to Analytics & Support Sub-governance work from October 4, 2020 through March 31, 2021 as follows:

  • Organization of team work
  • Organizing voting, deploying multisig, writing proposals.
  • Drawing up work plans and ensuring deadlines are met.
  • Maintaining statistics tables of contests, jury voting,.
  • Creation of reports, advertising of contests.
  • Moderation of chats and calls of Analytics & Support Sub-governance
  • Creation and administration of contests
  • Other socially useful activities for Analytics & Support Sub-governance

Only those activities for which the contestants were not awarded earlier are awarded!
The value to Analytics & Support Sub-governance and the amount of work performed will be assessed.


Remuneration based on past performance.


01 April 2021 (00:01 UTC) - 7 April 2021 (23:59 UTC). Participants must submit materials (screenshots, links, etc.) confirming their activity. Otherwise, no reward will be provided.


Please submit a PDF file with the evidence of your most significant contributions done within the specified time frame. The ways you can submit are (but not limited to) screenshots, clickable links, posts, activities, ranks, statistics, etc.

Based on the work performed, the jury will decide who has done the best valuable work so far.

Do not submit those works and activities that you have already submitted to other contests! The same activity should not be rewarded twice.


To reward the participants, funds of 40,000 TON Crystal have been allocated, this motivation will be spent in full. Funds are allocated from the budget of A&S SG. The reward will be distributed among the participants who have proven their activity.

40,000 TON Crystal will be distributed as a percentage according to the points scored. The reward will be paid to all participants who have scored more than 3 points.

The calculation of the distribution of prizes by percentage will be made in an Excel table. The formula is given below.

Excel Formula for “Reward”:

=IF((PrizeFund/(SUM(Submissions With Avg. Score>Score Threshold)-(Score Threshold*(COUNTIF(Submissions With Avg.Score>Score Threshold)))(Submission Avg. Score - Score Threshold))>0;(Prize Fund/(SUM(Submissions With Avg. Score>Score Threshold) - (Score Threshold(COUNTIF(Submissions With Avg.Score>Score Threshold)))*(Submission Avg. Score - Score Threshold));0)

Static values:

Prize Fund = 40k

Score Threshold = 3 Submissions With Avg. Score >=3

Dynamic values: Submission Avg. Score

Link to the document where the calculations will be made

Jury Rewards

An amount equal to 10% of the sum total of all total tokens awarded to contest winners will be distributed among jurors who vote and provide feedback. This percentage will be awarded on the following basis:

  • The percentage of tokens awarded to the jury will be distributed based on the number of votes each juror casts. For example, if one juror votes 20 times and another juror votes 5 times, the juror who votes 20 times will get 4 times more tokens than the juror who votes 5 times.

  • Detailed feedback is mandatory in order to collect any rewards.

Reward for contest creation:

An amount equal to 1% of the sum total of all total tokens awarded to contest winners will be distributed to the author of the contest…


  • The juror must have a solid understanding of the described subject in order to provide a score and feedback. If not, the juror should choose to “Abstain”.

  • Member of the jury cannot vote for their work

  • Each juror will vote by rating each submission on a scale of 1 to 10 or can choose to reject it if it does not meet requirements or vote “Abstain” if they feel unqualified to judge.

  • Jurors must provide feedback on submissions or lose their reward.

  • The Jury must be objective and give reasons for their assessment.

  • The Jury should reject duplicate, incomplete, or inappropriate submissions.

  • The number of days for jury voting is hereby set at 5 days

Procedural Requirements

  • Participants must upload their work correctly so it can be viewed and accessible in the formats described.
  • If work is inaccessible or does not fit the criteria described, the submission may be rejected by jurors.
  • If not submitted on time, the submission will not count.
  • Every contest submission must have an identifiable contact that can be matched with your discussion forum description.
  • If you did not provide a discussion forum description, then your submission must provide links to your online persona, such as a Telegram ID (preferred) or other direct contact information that can confirm that the work submitted is your own.
  • If you fail to provide a means to verify that the submission is your own work, your submission may be rejected.

Hello! :wave:
I sent my submission in PDF. TG @ElsbethTheOne


we should amend the procedure for DeWorkflow and should appoint different team set for every work we require because I have noticed the contest after work and its delay in previous completed contests result reports and prize distribution.

submission in PDF


Added my submission.


Hello everyone!
I sent my submission.


:wave: My Submission № 5


Please check my submission in PDF-file.


Hi ! My submission №7

1 Like

Hi all)) Added my submission))


Unfortunately my submission #7 doesn’t open, because of interface issues. Attention to jurors, please reject submission #7 and vote for the submission #9. Thank you!


Glad to see active members here. Good luck)


Submitting DeWorkflow :+1:

1 Like

Good luck to all. I’ll join the next DeWorkflow

It is a pity that Marina did not submit pdf.
On many of the recordings that I listened to, she moderated the calls. It’s time and effort too


:thinking:Surprisingly I want to say about A&S subgovernance immature management and its disability to finish a contest in fixed timeline.

A&S subgovernance have different categorised contests for different purposes and every contest have rewards for different tasks such as

  • winners reward
  • jury reward
  • administration reward

If participants have fixed timeline for submitting a submission and jury have fixed timeline for voting, then why administration haven’t any fixed timeline for completing a contest as a whole with results and rewards distribution.

Today’s world isn’t as slow as we are assuming, everyone wants to go for next things in time without grabbed in the same. We launched some contests in last month but not completed those as a whole with results and rewards distribution and launched a contest for administrative works without completed last ones. Then why not we are merging SG administrative works rewards within the contest itself by 10-30% of total.

Solution cum amendment:

  1. Every contest should have four types of timeline
  • Contest proposal voting
  • Contest submission
  • Jury voting
  • Results and rewards distribution
  1. Prepare catalog of administrative works we require.
  2. Appoint at least three jurors for every specific task so that task can be completed in time with more authenticity.
  3. Publish result and proof of prize distribution on the contest thread within fixed time frame, otherwise all appointed members for that task will be suspended and will lead to immediate appointment of new team set to complete the remaining task.
  4. All team sets for different required task will be appointed by all jury members mutual consensus.
  5. Rewards of every administrative task will be divided equally within team members appointed for that task only.


If Free TON community is also paying rewards for administrative works then at least these works should be also completed with fast processings without any delay.
If we can’t work in time then why not giving chance to other Free TON enthusiasts to come and contribute. Why same members are working in 4-5 SGs just to collect more rewards.

1 Like

For the last two contests, yes, the payment is prepared for a very long time. For the first time, A&S was faced with the uncertainty of “Redject” and the need for a recount. As you already know, we managed to solve these problems with the help of two “Proposals”, one of which is an accepted set of rules. All these actions took a lot of time.
I believe that the following periods determine the winners and pay awards. It will pass much faster.


You are welcome to join to build SG better and fast.

1 Like

I’m just a bit of subgovernance but I think everyone have a right to raise problems and issues asap so that same can be solved fast than ever with more smart jury management.

I’m ready to create report on result of the contest. Give me access to docs.

What exactly report do you want to prepair?