Hey there. With the regards to the analytics, the numbers are correct, but the conclusions are misleading. The transfered amount of 1.2m tokens are still on the hot wallet of kuna (exchange). The tokens are in the order book. The book was empty, so we filled it.
The only funds that we have spent are about 50k ton, that we spent to develop a token for our stable coin.
Куна самая лучшая биржа на которой торгуется тон, всегда четко работает, много интересного контента на канале куны. Один из топовых партнёров на сегодняшний день👍
Yes. If you wonder what happens to price when it wants to break some resistances… Some of the impatient initial members just slam dunk on price’s head so hard that it dips like crazy…
Reading some “When someone sells, someone buys” comments here & there but there’s a difference between selling & dumping… If you’re familiar with order books on exchanges, when someone dumps, he “market sells” meaning filling all low-price bids & pulling the price down to deep wells.
And of course, there’s a huge difference between an ordinary user selling his/her tokens & initial members selling their tokens. The latter means we’re quitting the project that we run & we lost our hope in this project. Well, that’s a bad signal for newcomers…
Thank you for your report! I have comments regarding 2 initial members. Robonomics deployed all contracts from Ethereum into Free TON GitHub - airalab/freeton-robonomics_contracts: FreeTON version of robonomics contracts, FreeTON Robonomics demo - YouTube. They plan to launch a virtual Free TON lab on the base of one of leading St. Petersburg universities to onboard developers. IoTonTON developed all smart contracts for IoT sensors integration via Free TON, developed Free TON browser app to create an experimental DeBot interfaces to work with BLE devices and AES encryption GitHub - mikhailUshakoff/deiot.
We’re going to public the second sheet on initial members today . So everyone can see the size of work done and compare it to the realised token amount. All the cooperation from initial members on this work would be appreciated.
See? and here’s another great example of where jumping to conclusions can cause damage to reputations unjustifiably. Thank you Kuna for clarifying this.
Be diligent, folks. Not everything is always as it appears.
Очень хорошо, что вы дали разьяснения, крипто сообщество ранее не получало поводов для сомнений в деятельности биржи Куна и сейчас их тоже не должно быть.
Как организатор конкурсов трейдеров и холдеров на бирже Куна от проекта Free TON могу подтвердить, что объемы торгов действительно бывают очень маленькие и пополнение стаканов из общего фонда периодически необходимо делать для поддержания активности торгов.
It is very good that you provided explanations, the crypto community did not previously receive reasons for doubts about the activities of the Kuna exchange and now they should not be there either.
As an organizer of contests for traders and holders on the Kuna exchange, I can confirm that the trading volumes are really very small and the order book from the general fund must be replenished from time to time to maintain trading activity.
I know Sharif was with Free TON since inception. He helped launch it and start all the PR on it. He still does a lot of important tasks including working on the NFT side of things with developing projects. I support Sharif.
Hi all, as Ron mentioned (thanks Ron), I’m an initial member, a TON Crystal HODLer and the person who led the FreeTON launch PR. I stepped back once decentralization and the Community Voice subgov emerged, allowing a far more diverse group to take over.
I did receive tokens, both for myself and to distribute to organisations who were crazy enough to work in return for a currency that was, in those days, worth $0.
Some of those tokens would have been sold since then. In my case, I sold just enough to cover about half of what I would have charged for my professional services out in the traditional world.
thanks for your survey, Platon, we would review it more closely, but appreciate your work proceeded.
Just from a glance, we can say that our move to the new set of nodes was misinterpreted (we are now running 3 nodes instead of 2), so tokens were moved to the new nodes, not anywhere else.
Regarding our contribution:
BlockRock was an active member of the community, including supporting of creating FreeTon DeFi Alliance and being it’s member since inception. On the top of our initial obligations, we have supported FreeTon with our offline events, gathering around developers community, and also became active members of FreeTon Academy, actively developing it too.