Proposal: Airdrop Mechanics -- Contest Rewards Amendment

Governance contests Contest Proposals
#1

Was:

1st prize…………………………30,000 Tons

2nd prize……………………….20,000 Tons

3rd prize………………………. 10,000 Tons

Next 10 runners up…………. 1,000 Tons each

Jury members who vote…. 500 Tons each for doing their civic duty

Proposed:

Contestant prize:

The top 30 winners will be chosen based on Ratings and receive awards as follows:

Highest rated………………………… 30,000 Tons

2nd highest rated……………………29,000 Tons

3rd highest rated…………………… 28,000 Tons

4th highest rated…………………… 27,000 Tons

And so on…
.
.
Until the least rated of top 30……… 1,000 Tons

Jury prize:

Jury members who vote…….……… 1,000 Tons each for performing your civic duty

6 Likes
Contest: Airdrop Mechanics [Finished]
#2

Proposal link :point_right: https://freeton.org/proposal?proposalAddress=0:abd6aa6804e94303df43a90519333ffacfe3616c2208f33c03dedba7ed849afd

1 Like
#3

Just copying my reply from the other thread here:

given how much attention this contest got relative to other contests, I think it is reasonable to increase rewards.
I think giving a decent reward to more contestant is nice, but personally I think your proposal is too flat
and I would prefer a little steeper payout.
So I would also increase 1st.
My Proposal with the same amount of total allocation (465k):

  1. 50k
  2. 40k
  3. 35k
  4. 30k
  5. 25k
  6. 23k
  7. 21k
  8. 19k
  9. 17k
  10. 15k
    11-15. 14k
    16.-20. 11k
    21.-25. 8k
    26.-30. 5k

I agree with giving jury members 1k instead of 500 since they have a lot more to read than usual.

2 Likes
#4

Считаю что 500 монет точно мало за судейство в этом конкурсе связи с большим количеством заявок. Возможно даже вознаграждение поднять до размера приза за последнее место.
2. разрыв между размером приза за первое место и за пятое не должен быть таким большим как во 2варианте(50,40,35,30,25) первый предложенный вариант считаю лучше 30,29,28,27,26. Так как это не соревнование кто лучше а конкурс по сбору и рассмотрению всевозможных предложений по механике аирдропа , с субъективным судейством, и возможно не самое лучшее предложение после доработки, или объединения с другой слабой идеей будет гораздо лучше чем первоначальная идея победителя.

2 Likes