Большенство работ предоставленые на конкруесе, выглядят как будто самапальные проекты для здачи экзаменов.
Не думаю чо после конкрусна их будут дорабатывать.
Лично я считаю что надо делать связь между метомаск и Keplr.
Эти предоставленные конкурсные ноунейм расширения врядле кто то захочет скачивать.
Особенно пока они выглядят как самопал, я бы таким проектом не доверил свои монеты, они обнову пропишут в расширении и деньги в миг улетят им на кошелек.
MegaTon тоже ничего, как не странно но почему то к нему больше доверие, может быть так влияет жолтый и оранжевый цвет и то что он выглядит как кошелек для разработчиков, не знаю даже.
About trustless solutions. Any solution will earn the own reputation as possible. Anyone can learn open sources, build their own extension and install manually, no proprietary code, etc.
Also, about other contestants. All spend many hours to create own solutions, it is abnormal to judge by logo side, etc. Anyone can learn sources and build their own extension. Many teams implemented the build system. In any case, all solutions will compete not here, but on the market, and the only users will the main judges.
If you like solid “brands”, like a Broxus, that use their solution. But many features from other solutions are absent in the crystal wallet.
In the end, any user will vote not by the own assets, people will select by stability, quick work, and features set.
IMHO: about Metamask, it is not a good solution, because only npm packages demand around 1.7Gb. If you worry about malicious code, that you don’t need to trust this solution. They are trying to solve this issue (with potential vulnerable external packages), by auditing by safe environment (GitHub - LavaMoat/LavaMoat: tools for sandboxing your dependency graph). All this because they have big code and big package dependencies graph.
One more personal moment - our team will be implemented a zero dependencies wallet in the next version. In the next step, users will be able to create multisign wallets (version with custodian) that can be activated with signatures from several devices. It will allow avoiding any suspicious about our team. Because then need to add bad code to many sources. Also, the user will be able to run the app to sign transactions in a safe environment, to get signed transactions, but run it on the blockchain directly to run the important transactions. Safety - the most important moment. Also, the user can install the not upgradable version from the sources or pre-build version.
Спасибо, за отзыв про мегатон.
Думаю буду продолжать, есть идеи добавить возможность загрузить любые контракты для продвинутых пользователей.
Ну разные языки и мелкие фикси само собой…
Обещаем завоевать доверие . Сделаем инструкцию как проверить соответствие кода на GitHub и выгруженного в сторы приложения. Спасибо за отзыв по дизайну, по логотипу может еще подумаем)
Скоро запустим сайт с дополнительной информацией.
Due to the fact that the jury in this contest is compiled from the jury members of DeFi and DevEx subgovernances and the contest is run in the '‘main governance’, the smart-contract had to be redeployed. Additional 7 days have been added to the voting.
Unfortunately, 2 members of the jury who managed to vote will have to put down their marks again. We are very sorry for this additional work. But it turned out that most of the jury members could not vote due to an error.
As the number of wallets supporting FreeTON grows, I decided to draft the standard of payment links in TON Crystals similar to BIP-21 in Bitcoin but taking into account some of the features of TON.
This standard doesn’t cover:
Smart contracts calls and payload in general (only simple comment is supported)
TIP-3 and NFT tokens transfer (I reserved separate TIPs as extensions of this standard)
. Сделаем инструкцию как проверить соответствие кода на GitHub и выгруженного в сторы приложения. Спасибо за отзыв по дизайну, по логотипу может еще подумаем)
