Contest: DeAnalytics Q2/21 Token Distribution Program

Analytics & Support Sub-governance Proposals
#4

Да, справедливее.
По завершению голосования Q1 я подведу итог (для примера) в таблице (Beta). Расчет награды участников от количества отчетов каждого участника.
В данный момент, я с осторожностью отношусь к этой системе распределения награды. Это может отпугнуть новых кандидатов на участие в конкурсе. Очень мало участников, всего 6 человек. Работа трудоемкая, требует внимательности и занимает много времени.
Не стоит торопиться, эту систему сможем применить в следующих кварталах если будет больше участников (минимум 10 кандидатов).

Yes, fairer.
At the end of the Q1 vote, I will summarize (for example) in the table (Beta). Calculation of the participants ’ reward based on the number of reports of each participant.
At the moment, I am wary of this reward distribution system. This may discourage new candidates from entering the competition. Very few participants, only 6 people. The work is time-consuming, requires care and takes a lot of time.
Do not rush, we will be able to apply this system in the next quarters if there are more participants (at least 10 candidates).

1 Like
#5

Hello, is there an update? When will the contest be active?

#6

Hello. By the end of this month, I will send the contest for signature.
No one else has any comments and recommendations, I think the contest is approved. It remains to sign and move to active.

1 Like
#7

Итоги по Q1 2021:

В рамках Deanalytics было подготовлено 15 аналитических справок + 5 интервью представителей проектов.

Аналитические справки (далее сокращенно АС)/количество:

  1. TON BRAINS (2АС)
  2. SiGMA (2 АС)
  3. Hackernoon (3АС)
  4. koshelek ru (2АС)
  5. Clicksoft (2АС)
  6. Forgingblock (3АС)
  7. reflex token (3АС)
  8. digital proof (1АС)
  9. rusbit (1АС)
  10. YPO (1АС)
  11. Mona (1АС)
  12. Aparat (1АС)
  13. Free TON DeFi Alliance (1АС)
  14. Pregnancy Tracker (1АС)
  15. Dummies chatbot (1АС)

1280×94 52.7 KB

Как видно из таблицы, 3 – это максимальное количество отчетов, которое было получено по одному и тому же партнеру: Hackernoon, Forgingblock, Reflex token. По остальным партнерским заявкам было 1-2 АС.

Интервью:

  • Rusbit (nn52nn)
  • Clicksoft (lvv)
  • Forgingblock (lvv)
  • hackernoon (lvv)
  • moni(lvv)

Результаты:

1 место: было представлено 66% от общего количества работ(10АС).
2 место: было представлено 40% от общего количества работ(6АС).
3 место: было представлено 20% от общего количества работ(3АС).

Таким образом, большая часть объема работы была выполнена командами, занявшими 1-2 места.

Общий бюджет за Q1 рассчитывался как будто было получено 8 аналитических справок, ссылаясь на то, что в учет должны браться исключительно партнерские заявки, которые были получены в Q1, а то, что был закрыт прошлогодний гэп по актуальным партнерским заявкам, не учитывалось.

Для более справедливой системы вознаграждений предлагаю внести следующие изменения.

Бюджет не изменять, изменить саму структуру его формирования:
а) 15000 TON Crystal + б) 135000 TON Crystal при условии, что будет получено 20 партнерских заявок.

Т.е если в Q2 будет получено 10 партнерских заявок, то «мотивация» составит
15000+ 67500= 82500.

При такой системе оценок учитывается весь спектр работ:

  • Аналитические справки по запросу сообщества (заявки, полученные не в Q2, но актуальные и требующие аналитики)
  • Краткие версии АМА-сессий, перевод на англ.
  • Интервью
  • Работа в партнерских ветках

К тому же, общий бюджет должен зависеть от вклада каждого участника. Предложенный вариант, чтобы бюджет зависел от максимального количества АС, сделанных одним участником, не приемлем. При таком подходе, 1-2 команды “пашут”, соревнуясь, другие молча аплодируют, сделав 1 - 2 отчета. Данный подход не видится правильным.

Учитывая, что сейчас наибольший объем работы берут на себя 2 команды, предлагаю уменьшить разрыв между 1-2 местами, и сократить количество призовых мест хотя бы до 8, перекинув % с 9-10 мест на 1-2
(Учитывая тот факт, что 10 участников еще ни разу за 2 квартала не было)

1st place……………… 37.00%

2nd………………………. 28.00%

3rd………………………… 10.00%

4th………………………… 7 .00%

5th………………………… 6 .00%

6th………………………… 5.00%

7th………………………… 4.00%

8th………………………… 3.00%

5 Likes
#8

Нуу, на данный момент ГЭП закрыт. На это в принципе можем больше не отвлекаться. Сосредоточится на новых партнерствах и рассчитывать ревард от общего количества поступивших партнерств в Q2.

Такой расчет тоже не особо справедливый и спорный. Я подвел итог (Beta) по Q1 (вознаграждение участников от количества опубликованных отчетов) посмотрите в этой таблице, вкладка Q1. Такой расчет стимулирует участников делать больше отчетов. Участники которые аплодируют, получают соответствующие токены.

Что такое DeAnalytics ? Как я его вижу.
Все что связанно с партнером - это все DeAnalytics.
Аналитические справки, KPI отчеты, краткие АМА, перевод на англ, интервью, работа в партнерских ветках, проверка входящего - это все DeAnalytics.
Участник (команда) который нацелен на первое место, должен стараться максимально выполнять все эти пункты. Отметить свою деятельность в отчетах и PDF, занять соответствующее призовое место.

Сейчас головная боль, это KPI отчеты (уже пора). Как их учитывать? как аналитическая справка 1 в 1. Или делать по ним отдельный конкурс.
Самый простой вариант, ежеквартально выбирать три аналитические команды, которые делают все что связанно с партнерами. Публикуют отчеты и заявку PDF, делят определенный ревард и идут на перевыборы на следующий квартал. На этой неделе будем обсуждать систему по работе команд.

Well, the GAP is closed at the moment. In principle, we can no longer be distracted by this. Will focus on new partnerships and calculate the forward from the total number of incoming partnerships in Q2.

This calculation is also not particularly fair and controversial. I have summed up (Beta) on Q1 (reward of participants from the number of published reports) look in this table, Q1 tab. This calculation encourages participants to make more reports. Participants who applaud receive the corresponding tokens.

What is DeAnalytics ? The way I see it.
Everything related to the partner is all DeAnalytics.
Analytical reports, KPI reports, short AMAs, translation into English, interviews, working in partner branches, checking incoming traffic - all this is DeAnalytics.
The participant (team) who aims for the first place should try to fulfill all these points as much as possible. Mark your activities in reports and PDFs, and take the appropriate prize.

Now it’s a headache, it’s KPI reports (it’s time). How to account for them? as a 1-in-1 analytical reference. Or make a separate contest for them.
The easiest option is to choose three analytical teams on a quarterly basis, which do everything related to partners. Publish reports and PDFs, share a certain reward, and go for re-election for the next quarter. This week we will discuss the system for the work of teams.

#9

> 0:85414bd ···· 7fbede6c7
> 3 pts
> I see only comments on the forum, lack of data

@Roman_D Roman_D, I made one report, about which there is information in PDF.

WHY do you say that I have no reports?

#10

By the way, I didn’t notice it either. You needed to express this more vividly in your PDF (high-quality PDF is the key to success). Either way, it wouldn’t really affect the score. (simply put, the jury pulled you by the ears to overcome the threshold)

#11

It is difficult for me to imagine how you can not see it in PDF. This information is at the very beginning. In addition, my application was the first, the eyes had not yet to be tired.

#12

Общими усилиями закрыли гэп только по Q4-2020. Остались заявки на партнерства, поданные в Q1 2021 без аналитических справок, по которым еще не было голосования. Нужны они сообществу или нет - вопрос.

Первоначальный вариант DeAnalytics Q2/21 в стартовом посте не предусматривает разбора заявок за Q1/21. И подобная ситуация повторяется из квартала в квартал.

#13

I read that the deanalytics did not stop.
I was the first who made an analytical report on the MFCoin Network and Freeland Community Partnership Proposal, and now it turns out that it is not yet known what the form of the competition will be.

It is not surprising that there are so few participants in this contest, with such an organization the risks are too high.

#14

Contest: DeAnalytics Q2/21 Token Distribution Program

Description:

This competition is held to reward Free TON supporters who have made valuable contributions to the analysis of partner offers. The competition is intended for teams (participants) who published their analytical work in the second quarter of 2021. The goal is to motivate and evaluate the teams of Free TON project participants who are willing to spend their time studying, analyzing partners and providing KPI reports on accepted partners.

The reporting period for the accepted partner agreements has begun. All accepted partners have committed themselves to perform certain tasks specified in the partner offer. The Free TON community needs transparency and detailed reporting on previously accepted partner agreements. Independent (competent) teams of participants who are ready to take on such responsible activities should provide KPI reports on the accepted partner agreements that require special attention.

Type:

Remuneration based on past performance.

Contest dates:

July 05, 2021 (00:01 UTC) - July 11, 2021 (23:59 UTC). Participants must submit their materials (on partner analysis) during the voting period. Otherwise, the reward will not be provided.

Relevance:

Within the framework of this competition, teams (participants) must perform all analytical activities related to incoming partner offers and accepted agreements. The analytical report must be written in English and published in the relevant forum topic within 10 days from the date of receipt of the partner offer… Teams need to provide the most detailed reports on incoming partners and key performance indicators for accepted partner agreements. Team members should read in detail the accepted partnership agreement, which has been accepted and entered into force. It is necessary to properly understand and define the responsibilities of this partner. Evaluate the stated deadlines for fulfilling the obligations. Contact the management or a representative of this partner, get feedback to compile a detailed report on the KPI. Communication with representatives and discussion of the terms of the current stages of the partnership should take place in a cultured, polite and competent manner.

Basic requirements, but not limited to:

  • Team members should consider the importance of confidential information before publishing an analytical report
  • Teams are required to communicate directly and interact with the partner or their representative in the forum topic or in any other convenient way
  • If possible, take the initiative to coordinate possible AMA sessions or interviews, and agree on a date and time with the Free TON community moderators
  • It is mandatory to provide a detailed (reliable) analytical report on new partner offers
  • Teams must check the incoming request from each partner. Provide the necessary screenshots, links in your reports, or the appropriate forum topic
  • The report may contain an analysis of the usefulness of the partnership, recommendations, conclusions, or other relevant notes to the partner offer
  • Analytical teams (groups) must submit KPI reports on accepted partner agreements that require (will require in the near future) the next tranche
  • To protect against plagiarism, analytical reports must be original, be ready to confirm the originality of your work with screenshots, links, etc

In addition, team members must respond in a timely manner and provide reports on the key performance indicators of the current partner in advance before requesting the next tranche.

Reward:

To finance the teams (participants), a budget of 150,000 tokens is planned, this motivation will be spent by 100% if the contestants submit 20+ incoming and KPI reports on different partner offers. The amount of the prize pool will be distributed as a percentage. The funds are allocated from the A&S SG budget. The threshold is 5 points.

1st place………………… 50.00%

2nd………………………. 35.00%

3rd………………………… 15.00%

The team (participant) who does not score 5 points remains without remuneration. The remaining unallocated tokens will remain in the A&SG reserve and will be replenished for the next De Analytics contest.

Evaluation:

Please submit a PDF file with your most significant and useful contributions to partner analysis made in the second quarter of 2021. The methods of sending are (but are not limited to) screenshots, clickable links, messages describing the actions you performed, and so on. Based on the work done, the jury will determine which of you has done the most valuable work so far.

Jury Awards:

  • An amount equal to 15% of the sum total of all total tokens awarded to contest winners will be distributed among jurors who vote and provide feedback.
  • As per Procedural remarks on contests

Voting:

  • To evaluate the work of the participants, the jury members can use such basic criteria as: the number of completed works, the deadline for submitting the report, the quality of the work, the depth of the analysis, auxiliary analytics, verification of the received request for partnership, the availability of the report’s KPI, general recommendations and evaluation of the offer.
  • As per Procedural remarks on contests

Procedural Requirements:

  • Affiliated members - Reports, jury scores, or other influential data should not be taken into account if there is an indisputable connection between the team (participant), a jury member, or a partner.

As per Procedural remarks on contests

1 Like
#15

The calculation formula depends on the number of KPI reports (accepted partnerships) and partner offers received in the second quarter of 2021.

#16

The contest has been updated based on the recommendations of active participants.

1 Like
#17

how can anyone make a contribution or support in most simple way to get some rewards ?

#18

Anyone who participates can participate in the analysis of partner offers and provide KPI reports on previously accepted partner offers. The activity is very responsible (special preferences are given to analytical groups) from the next quarter, strictly only teams.
In the current competition, participants (single) can take part

1 Like
#19

SOPU is a group of 10K students with different skills and we’ll launch different teams to perform different duties for free ton.

#20

Correction, contest participants should prepare a KPI report only for those partners who have requested (are preparing to request) the next tranche.

1 Like
#21

Is there any hard rule for main governance to distribute next tranche to the partner ?

#22

I think that in order to receive a new tranche, the partner must fulfill its obligations at the current stage of the agreement. (there are no direct hard rules, everything is consistent with the proposal)

1 Like
#23

The partner must confirm that he has fulfilled the KPI specified in the partner proposal