Analytics & Support Sub-governance Proposal

Analytics & Support Sub-governance
#29

Этот инцидент был исчерпан, справедливость восторжествовала.

Попыток распилов далее не было обнаружено.

#30

Во-первых, как он стал начальным членом АНАЛИТИКИ?
Во-вторых, про какую проверки системы писал Сеня? ( или это была попытка скрыть свои грехи)

#31

i am interested with this proposal and want to take part as a team. is it available @Roman_D

1 Like
#32

It’s really suspicious that I can support ideas and have my own opinion as a member, right?)))

Why don’t you do a work and just speaking here? No any value)))

#33

Hi! Yes, for sure join here https://t.me/freeton_analytics More people are welcome)))

1 Like
#34

Ответье пожалуйста, как первоначальный член Analytics & Support Sub-governance и SMM Sub-governance и как Community manager at Free TON:
1.) почему человек, жульничество которого было доказано состоит в Analytics & Support Sub-governance? ( доказательство :Free TON Blog Contest results evaluation Proposal) Ваш комментарий где вы признаете их жульничество Free TON Blog Contest results evaluation Proposal)
2.) О какой проверке он говорил? ( после того когда жульничество было доказано)
3.) Когда поправите блог ( это официалный адрес Free TON) посмотрите на его загрузку ( https://yadi.sk/i/GAP4otyY_BMn7w )
4.) Почему человек победивший в конкурс блогов перестал печать статьи, когда это было указано в описании конкурса. Он просто получил деньги и все?

Please answer as an original member of Analytics & Support Sub-governance and SMM Sub-governance and as a Community manager at Free TON:
1.) why is a person whose fraud has been proven to be a member of Analytics & Support Sub-governance? ( evidence :Free TON Blog Contest results evaluation Proposal) Your comment where you acknowledge their Scam Free TON Blog Contest results evaluation Proposal)
2.) what kind of verification was he talking about? ( after the fraud was proven)
3.) When you fix the blog ( this is the official address of Free TON), look at its download ( https://yadi.sk/i/GAP4otyY_BMn7w )
4.) Why the person who won the blog contest stopped printing the article when it was indicated in the contest description. He just got the money and that’s it?

#35

Не забудьте предупредить, что за предложение или идею для группы аналитики, которые не вписываются в выше опубликованный контекст, запросто могут причислить к флуду и забанить

#36

Да, это так, ибо это рабочая группа) Бан выдал не я))

#37

Рабочая группа – это что за зверь? Предложения не принимаются? Смешно. Особенно рефлекс стаи.

#38
  1. Проблема была решена внутри рабочей группы, жульничества не произошло, если есть какие-то факты о которых мы не знаем, пишите в чат аналитики, ссылка выше)
  2. Без понятия
  3. Это не ко мне, я блогами не занимаюсь)
  4. Где человек выигравший в конкурсе Airdrop Mechanics и Landing Page? Сбор и предложение идей не означает их имплементацию))
  1. The problem was resolved within the working group, no scams happened, if there are any facts about which we do not know, write to the analytics chat, link above)
  2. I have no idea
  3. This question is not for me, ask people who made this blog)
  4. Where is the winner of the Airdrop Mechanics and Landing Page contests? Collecting and proposing ideas does not mean their implementation))
#39

Увы, так бывает) Рабочие группы - это группы сабгаверненсов, где люди ежедневно выполняют децентрализованные задачи по развитию экосистемы без лишнего флуда, по делу) Если кто желает привнести пользу может присоединиться и помочь с развитием)

1 Like
#40

joined, but most of chat using russian :grinning:

#41

Yes, there were a bots attack(((

#42

Блог относится к SMM Sub-governance, где вы initial member.(вопрос о исправлении blog.freeton.org и о публикации статей на блоге победителя)

касаемо жульничества, ваш ответ " Проблема решена внутри рабочей группы"…
Получается вы погрозили ему пальчиком, а затем взяли его в initial members Analytics & Support Sub-governance (чтобы он анализировал действия других людей) зная его репутацию? и то что он в сговоре, пытался обмануть все сообщество?

The blog belongs to SMM Sub-governance, where you are an initial member.(question about fixing the blog.freeton.org and about publishing articles on the winner’s blog)

regarding the Scam, your answer is “the Problem is solved within the working group” …
so You shook your finger at him, and then took him to the initial members Analytics & Support Sub-governance (so that he analyzed the actions of other people) knowing his reputation? and the fact that he was in cahoots, trying to deceive the entire community?

#43

Кого я взял? Проползал на сабгов висит в рабочей группе и любой может стать initial member) Репутация в чем? Он за себя не голосовал, проблема решена, в чем вопрос?

Whom did I take in sub-g? Sub-g proposal is available in each working group and anyone can become an initial member) Reputation in what? He did not vote for himself, the problem was resolved, what is the question?

#44

Предложение о создании модели экосистемы. А далее возможность прогноза более четких решений. Это все вы назвали флудом. Да и сейчас продолжаете. Да, не делайте, черт с вами.

#45

Hello guys,

As you know, I was in this subgov since the very beginning and I had my vision on what value we should bring to the entire Free TON. Transparency, advice to the Main governance, diversity, order, and structure (it’s analytics, isn’t it?).

What I see now doesn’t meet my own quality standards:

  • Bullying (if you disagree with the proposal and don’t vote, you are claimed as inactive and others will eject you)
  • Disrespect to each other’s opinion
  • No open room for dialog (everyone just expresses their opinions and there is always no time for real debates)
  • Absence of structure in decisions (faster-faster-faster, we need to do it now)

It’s not to mention:

  • No delivery of analytics results to the Main governance (ones for partnerships are always late, so no sense in it)
  • No effect on partnerships decisions
  • Launching contests without having a budget on multisig
  • Inconsistency of the spending compared to subgov’s objectives
  • Total misunderstanding of how decentralization works in Free TON (e.g., off-chain voting during the weekly call: each important decision should be run on-chain and voted for by the governance members and jurors, like your this or not).

To sum up:

  • Transparency - failed
  • Advice to Main governance - failed
  • Diversity - failed
  • Order and structure - failed

I really value my time and don’t want to continue to spend it in such a toxic atmosphere.

Count this as a resignation request from governance members and jury.

4 Likes
#46

I would like to add few comments:

— We are still in the same place, no steps forward;

— We make calls for calls, KPI is zero;

— We discessed partnership analytics more that 3 call, CARL!!!

— Important questions are missed!

— Where is analytics?

Fully support!

3 Likes
#47

To clarify, we are discussing the replacement of only the initials who are not active in the signature of the tender proposals or who wish to withdraw from the composition. For example, DeAnalytics third launch attempt.

To date, most of the partner offers have been worked out, and reports have been published in the forum branches.

I agree, the fact that today at the call we decided to add two new participants from the outside is so wrong. You need to make it a contest.
But to activate the workflow, I suggest replacing the initials who want to leave with A&S members in the inner core of the team. And to announce a competition for the recruitment of new members to the full composition.

As for the lack of influence on the decision on the partnership, to date, A&S does not have such tools. We need to work on this.

#48

So, 207000 TONs were invested in [your text here]. May I ask for report, how it was spent?

2 Likes